The federal process for forcing a credit bureau and the company that reported an item to investigate information you say is wrong.
Looking for a lawyer rather than a definition? Skip to the state-by-state list of Consumer Rights law firms.
Consumer reporting agencies must follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy, and a consumer who disputes an item directly with the agency triggers a mandatory reinvestigation. The agency must generally complete it within a defined period, must forward the dispute and all relevant information to the company that furnished the item, and must delete or correct anything it cannot verify.
The step most often skipped is disputing with the furnisher as well - the lender, collector or other company that supplied the information. Furnishers have their own investigation duties once a dispute reaches them through the agency, and a furnisher that keeps reporting information it knows to be inaccurate is a separate problem from an agency that fails to investigate.
Accuracy is not the only right in this area. The statute limits who may obtain a report and for what purposes, requires notice when information in a report is used against a consumer, and restricts how long most negative information may be reported.
Several details of the dispute process are easy to miss. The reinvestigation must be free of charge (15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(1)(A)). An agency may treat a dispute as frivolous or irrelevant, for example when it lacks enough information to investigate, but it must then tell the consumer so and say what is missing (§ 1681i(a)(3)). If an item is deleted, it may not be put back unless the furnisher certifies that it is complete and accurate and the consumer is notified of the reinsertion (§ 1681i(a)(5)(B)). If a dispute does not resolve the matter, the consumer may file a brief statement of the dispute, and later reports must note that the item is disputed (§ 1681i(b) and (c)). A furnisher's duty to investigate under § 1681s-2(b) is triggered by notice from the agency. The statute gives consumers no private claim for a furnisher's general accuracy duty in § 1681s-2(a) (see § 1681s-2(c)).
The point at which advice becomes useful is when a properly made dispute has already failed - the item was "verified" without any apparent investigation, or it was corrected and then reappeared. Disputing in writing and keeping proof of what was sent and when is what makes that failure demonstrable, and the statute provides for fees, so the cost of pursuing it is not necessarily borne by the consumer.
Worried about the cost? A lawyer can be hired for one part of a case only (limited-scope representation), may be paid from what a claim recovers (contingency fee), or may be free through a pro bono program or legal aid; a court can also waive its own filing fees.
Choose your state to see law firms for this in the city where we list the most; your city may be under “other cities”, A to Z.
Other entries in the same area of law, each written from the same primary sources.